![]() ![]() ![]() Here are some examples of this: White Cyclone xTreme II Black Deep Shredder 12 UCI 1.īxc6 Bxc6 6. Its aggression isnt in your face as HIARCS and Juniors can be but it is of a more subtle kind, and no less dangerous. It doesnt have Rybkas tactical hammer (which is why a super aggressive playing style probably wouldnt suit it) but it can push and squeeze in a position just as hard, maybe harder. The program plays with purpose and actively creates positional threats. ![]() This gives a good illustration of Shredders playing style: it plays the position.ĭeep Shredder 9 11 had a horrible limp-wristedness about them and Im pleased to say that this has gone. I believe the name comes from a surfing background, the idea being to shred (ride) the wave. Deep Shredder 11 was far below the average tactical strength for a new chess engine, scoring a mere 54 on my large tactical test suite (150 positions, 10 mins per position) - and Im running a Core i7 at 3.4GHz Of the 20 engines I tested HIARCS 12.1 was about average coming in at 75 while the best at tactics are Rybka 3 (90), Bright 0.4a (86), Zappa Mexico II (82).ĭeep Shredder 12 is an improvement over its predecessor with a 66 score, but still quite a long way below average.Īs has been observed many times tactical strength and elo do not go hand in hand but there is relevance in pointing these scores out, especially for analysis purposes. Tactical Strength Shredders tactical strength has always been dire.Ī number of weak players who barely use it assume that the name Shredder tactical monster and super aggressive opponent. Without doubt the search has been greatly improved on general considerations (though not tactical ones as we shall see) and it seems to be quite a bit faster at finding the critical lines. General Search DS12 runs examines approximately 75 of the ns DS11 did, but searches about a ply deeper over 1 minute. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |